Is Government Surveillance a Violation of the Fourth...

The government is always watching to ensure safety of their country, including everything and everyone in it. Camera surveillance has become an accepted and almost expected addition to modern safety and crime prevention (â€Å"Where† para 1). Many people willingly give authorization to companies like Google and Facebook to make billions selling their personal preferences, interests, and data. Canada participates with the United States and other countries in monitoring national and even global communications (â€Å"Where† para 2). Many question the usefulness of this kind of surveillance (Hier, Let, and Walby 1).However, surveillance, used non-discriminatorily, is, arguably, the key technology to preventing terrorist plots (Eijkman 1). Government†¦show more content†¦It was and is a sensible use of our comparative advantage in technology. It enables us to collect information that human intelligence has been unable to provide, given our difficulty of penetrating cells of radical Islamists, at home or abroad (Zuckerman para 3). Government officials try to put people’s concerns to rest with these statements, but the resentment toward the â€Å"snooping† continues (Zuckerman para 4) The government does, without a doubt have reason for the NSA’s surveillance. Citizens do not always fully understand legislation before becoming angry at someone. Who better to point a finger at than their government (Zuckerman para 7)? Despite the actual legal terms on surveillance, innocent citizens feel that they have had their rights violated and wonder why the government needs their information if they have nothing to hide. The supreme court declared in the third party doctrine that â€Å"anyone turning over information to a third party, such as a bank or Internet service provider, has no right to object if that information is later shared with the government† (Timberg para 11). Whether they understand the law or not, most people feel that their information should not be unnecessarily subjected to the government without their voiced approval (Zuckerman para 6). â€Å"Quite simply, the administration could have done a much better job of explaining both the potential and the limits of data mining. It should have made it clearShow MoreRelatedThe Rights And Civil Liberties1558 Words   |  7 Pagesrights and civil liberties that places limits on government power. These rights are known as the Bill of Rights; the first 10 amendments to the United States Constitution. One right in particular I want to discuss is the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment is known as the right against â€Å"unreasonable search and seizures.† It is the basis of the law with regards to stop-and-frisk, search warrants, wiretaps, and other forms of surveillance. This Amendment states that â€Å"The right of the people to be secureRead MoreThe Fourth Amendment Is On Privacy1502 Words   |  7 PagesThe search and seizure stipulate that the Fourth Amendment is about privacy. It gives a previsi on of protection of personal privacy to every citizen’s right, not to serve as a fixed protection against the misuse of the government, but to be free from unreasonable government intrusion into individuals lives. There is an understanding that one must know when looking into the Fourth Amendment and expecting protection, that must be considered. It serves as a protection for the rights of the people duringRead MoreSocial And Political Landscape : September 111670 Words   |  7 Pagesfall under the stereotypical image of a terrorist. The government and citizens all asked questions alike, â€Å"Why, how, and who did this?† The government had failed in doing its job as protector of its citizens. To act on this failure of protection, President George W. Bush â€Å"initiated warrantless domestic surveillance by the NSA† in hopes that they could prevent another attack like this from ever occurring again (Schell par. 11). The government began to search â€Å"layers of phone numbers† and deal withRead MoreDomestic Surveillance And Coalition With The Nsa769 Words   |  4 PagesDomestic Surveillance in Coalition with the NSA Rand Paul, of the Wall Street Journal states, â€Å"How many records did the NSA seize from Verizon† (Paul)? Verizon is an enormous phone company that covers more than 308 million people. All of the phone information secured in the Verizon Company, is now being monitored and viewed by the US Government, which was initially kept secret from the people, under code name PRISM (Greenwald). The information under this code name was then leaked by a former NSARead MoreLaw Enforcement s Use Of Illegal Search Warrants1009 Words   |  5 PagesLaw Enforcement’s use of illegal search warrants in violation of the fourth amendment rights. This is the case of Jones v. United States (2012). Antoine Jones owned a nightclub in the District of Columbia. In 2004, a joint Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Metropolitan Police Department task force began investigating Jones for narcotics violations. During the course of the investigation, a Global Positioning System (GPS) device was installed on Jones s Jeep Grand Cherokee, without a validRead MoreWhat Violates The Fourth Amendment?1194 Words   |  5 PagesWhat Violates the Fourth Amendment? â€Å"Unreasonable search and seizures shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.† – Amendment IV The most controversial aspect of the fourth amendment is the debate over what constitutes as a legitimate search. Since the amendment’s addition to the constitution on December 15, 1791, citizens have questionedRead MoreKyllo V. Us : Facts About The Case914 Words   |  4 Pagesoutside the premises of one Lee Kyllo in Oregon. At the evidentiary hearing argued at the District court, the court held that the instrument used is not able to penetrate through walls and expose conversations or other human movements. After the surveillance using the device, it was concluded that the amount of heat emanating from Kyllo’s residence was abnormal particularly from the garage roof and sidewalls (the premise is that to grow cannabis sativa inside a house on needs a large amount of lightRead MoreThe Impact Of Technological Surveillance On Human Surveillance1549 Words   |  7 Pagesadvances in surveillance will be analyzed. Whitebread, and Slobogin (2014) give a good working definition of what technological surveillance is and what is covers. â€Å"Technological surveillance,†¦ is meant to encompass a wide variety of techniques that enhance the ability to ease drop or spy on the activities of others† (Whitebread and Slobogin, 2004, p. 134,)There are many forms of technological surveillance, example will be show through case law. As new forms of technological surveillance arise, moreRead MoreThe Ns The National Security Agency1250 Words   |  5 Pages The National Security Agency or otherwise known as the NSA, had sparked a recent debate of the fundamental amendment rights that American citizens have. To provide some historical context, the NSA in 2013 was exposed by Edward Snowden, a former contractor and employer of the NSA. He was a NSA whistleblower who divulged the surveilling tactics that the government had imposed on its citizens, as well as on many of its international allies. Many senior governmental officials had repeatedly statedRead MoreEssay about Privacy Under the Fourth Amendment928 Words   |  4 PagesPrivacy Under the Fourth Amendment Katz V. The United States The petitioner Mr. Katz was arrested for illegal gambling, he had been gambling over a public phone. The FBI attached an electronic recorder onto the outside of the public phone booth. The state courts claimed this to be legal because the recording device was on the outside of the phone and the FBI never entered the booth. The Supreme Court Ruled in the favor of Katz. They stated that the Fourth Amendment allowed for the protection